https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338317 The Tribunal held that GTA service availed before 1.4.2008 qualifies as an input service under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, as it falls within the definition of "upto the place of removal." The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, and a miscellaneous application for an extension of the interim stay order was dismissed following the resolution of the appeal. en-us Mon, 02 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Mar 2017 11:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338317 The Tribunal held that GTA service availed before 1.4.2008 qualifies as an input service under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, as it falls within the definition of "upto the place of removal." The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, and a miscellaneous application for an extension of the interim stay order was dismissed following the resolution of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 02 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338317