<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 14 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338314</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the plea to stay the criminal proceedings while directing the CESTAT to resolve the pending appeals promptly. The judgment highlighted the independence of criminal and departmental proceedings, emphasizing the need for evidence-based decisions in each case. The petitioner&#039;s claim for rebate on excise duty paid on export goods was subject to scrutiny and legal challenges, leading to a complex legal battle involving multiple appeals and investigations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 14 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338314</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the plea to stay the criminal proceedings while directing the CESTAT to resolve the pending appeals promptly. The judgment highlighted the independence of criminal and departmental proceedings, emphasizing the need for evidence-based decisions in each case. The petitioner&#039;s claim for rebate on excise duty paid on export goods was subject to scrutiny and legal challenges, leading to a complex legal battle involving multiple appeals and investigations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>