<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 10 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338310</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Writ Petition, upholding the demand for establishment charges under the Private Bonded Warehouse Licence. It found the petitioner liable to pay the charges as specified in the licence conditions, rejecting the argument based on a circular by a different department. The judgment emphasized the petitioner&#039;s obligation to comply with the payment requirements outlined in the licence and affirmed the Customs Department&#039;s right to seek payment for supervision and establishment charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 10 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338310</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Writ Petition, upholding the demand for establishment charges under the Private Bonded Warehouse Licence. It found the petitioner liable to pay the charges as specified in the licence conditions, rejecting the argument based on a circular by a different department. The judgment emphasized the petitioner&#039;s obligation to comply with the payment requirements outlined in the licence and affirmed the Customs Department&#039;s right to seek payment for supervision and establishment charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>