https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338301 The court allowed the petitioner's advocate to be present during interrogation within visible distance but beyond hearing range, addressing concerns about coercion. No stay was granted on further proceedings, emphasizing the petitioner's cooperation in the investigation. The court did not restrain the Directorate of Enforcement from taking coercive action, highlighting the importance of cooperation. The issue of awarding costs to the petitioner was not explicitly addressed in the judgment. en-us Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Feb 2017 08:39:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338301 The court allowed the petitioner's advocate to be present during interrogation within visible distance but beyond hearing range, addressing concerns about coercion. No stay was granted on further proceedings, emphasizing the petitioner's cooperation in the investigation. The court did not restrain the Directorate of Enforcement from taking coercive action, highlighting the importance of cooperation. The issue of awarding costs to the petitioner was not explicitly addressed in the judgment. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338301