<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (8) TMI 402 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190018</link>
    <description>The court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 3(3C) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and the notification dated March 24, 1966. It determined that zoning and price fixation were legislative actions not necessitating individual notices or hearings. The court emphasized the importance of expert recommendations in policy decisions and dismissed the appeals, affirming that the measures were in the economic interest of the sugar industry and the public.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:09:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (8) TMI 402 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190018</link>
      <description>The court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 3(3C) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and the notification dated March 24, 1966. It determined that zoning and price fixation were legislative actions not necessitating individual notices or hearings. The court emphasized the importance of expert recommendations in policy decisions and dismissed the appeals, affirming that the measures were in the economic interest of the sugar industry and the public.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>