<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (8) TMI 71 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190017</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the U.P. Higher Judicial Service Rules were constitutionally void, and appointments made under these rules were illegal. The Court issued a writ of mandamus directing the respondent not to make any appointments by direct recruitment to the U.P. Higher Judicial Service based on the invalid selections. The appeal was allowed, and costs were awarded to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:07:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (8) TMI 71 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190017</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the U.P. Higher Judicial Service Rules were constitutionally void, and appointments made under these rules were illegal. The Court issued a writ of mandamus directing the respondent not to make any appointments by direct recruitment to the U.P. Higher Judicial Service based on the invalid selections. The appeal was allowed, and costs were awarded to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>