<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 958 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190013</link>
    <description>The Letters Patent Appeal against the order of a learned Single Judge of the Patna High Court was found to be maintainable under clause 10 of the Letters Patent of Patna High Court. The High Court&#039;s decision deeming the appeal not maintainable was overturned, and the Letters Patent Appeal was reinstated for further consideration on its merits. The appeal was allowed without any order as to costs, offering a conclusive resolution to the issues raised in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:29:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 958 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190013</link>
      <description>The Letters Patent Appeal against the order of a learned Single Judge of the Patna High Court was found to be maintainable under clause 10 of the Letters Patent of Patna High Court. The High Court&#039;s decision deeming the appeal not maintainable was overturned, and the Letters Patent Appeal was reinstated for further consideration on its merits. The appeal was allowed without any order as to costs, offering a conclusive resolution to the issues raised in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>