<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 958 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190013</link>
    <description>Clause 10 of the Patna Letters Patent was construed as conferring a general right of intra-court appeal from a Single Judge&#039;s judgment, subject only to express exclusions such as second appeals, revisions, and specified supervisory or criminal orders. A Single Judge&#039;s appellate disposition did not, by itself, bar a Letters Patent Appeal unless the matter fell within one of those excluded categories. The Court distinguished authorities involving an express statutory bar on further appeal and held that no similar prohibition applied here, so the intra-court appeal was maintainable and had been wrongly dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:29:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 958 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190013</link>
      <description>Clause 10 of the Patna Letters Patent was construed as conferring a general right of intra-court appeal from a Single Judge&#039;s judgment, subject only to express exclusions such as second appeals, revisions, and specified supervisory or criminal orders. A Single Judge&#039;s appellate disposition did not, by itself, bar a Letters Patent Appeal unless the matter fell within one of those excluded categories. The Court distinguished authorities involving an express statutory bar on further appeal and held that no similar prohibition applied here, so the intra-court appeal was maintainable and had been wrongly dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>