https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190012 Section 3(1)(b) of the Madhya Pradesh Public Security Act, 1959 was held to impose unreasonable restrictions on freedom of movement because it allowed compulsory residence or stay at a place chosen by the authority without hearing, limits on distance or suitability, or safeguards for livelihood, and the provision was invalid in its entirety. Article 358 did not cure that defect during the emergency under Article 352, because it suspends Article 19 prospectively only and does not revive a statutory provision already void under Article 13(2). The impugned executive order, lacking valid statutory support, could not be sustained. en-us Mon, 23 Jan 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:29:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190012 Section 3(1)(b) of the Madhya Pradesh Public Security Act, 1959 was held to impose unreasonable restrictions on freedom of movement because it allowed compulsory residence or stay at a place chosen by the authority without hearing, limits on distance or suitability, or safeguards for livelihood, and the provision was invalid in its entirety. Article 358 did not cure that defect during the emergency under Article 352, because it suspends Article 19 prospectively only and does not revive a statutory provision already void under Article 13(2). The impugned executive order, lacking valid statutory support, could not be sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 23 Jan 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190012