https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190011 An order under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 can qualify as a "judgment" under Clause 10 of the Patna Letters Patent if it finally determines a substantive right or obligation and has the trappings of finality. Applying that test, the Court held that an order directing payment of last drawn wages during the pendency of industrial proceedings affects valuable rights of the parties and is not a mere routine interlocutory direction. The Letters Patent Appeal was therefore maintainable, and the view that it was not appealable was erroneous. en-us Thu, 25 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:18:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190011 An order under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 can qualify as a "judgment" under Clause 10 of the Patna Letters Patent if it finally determines a substantive right or obligation and has the trappings of finality. Applying that test, the Court held that an order directing payment of last drawn wages during the pendency of industrial proceedings affects valuable rights of the parties and is not a mere routine interlocutory direction. The Letters Patent Appeal was therefore maintainable, and the view that it was not appealable was erroneous. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190011