https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190009 The SC determined that the prosecution failed to prove the charges against the accused-appellant beyond reasonable doubt due to discrepancies in evidence, particularly concerning the recovery of the weapon and the application of Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act. Consequently, the appellant was acquitted, and the appeal was allowed, discharging the bail bonds. en-us Thu, 05 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Jun 2024 13:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190009 The SC determined that the prosecution failed to prove the charges against the accused-appellant beyond reasonable doubt due to discrepancies in evidence, particularly concerning the recovery of the weapon and the application of Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act. Consequently, the appellant was acquitted, and the appeal was allowed, discharging the bail bonds. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190009