https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190008 A Letters Patent Appeal was held not maintainable against a Single Judge's order passed in an appeal under Order 43, Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The text explains that Order 43 appeals are governed by Section 104 CPC, and Section 104(2) expressly bars any further appeal from an order made in such an appeal. The ratio in Shah Babulal Khimji was treated as inapplicable because it concerned an interlocutory order on the original side of the High Court, where a Letters Patent Appeal lay from a Single Judge to a Division Bench. The challenge therefore failed. en-us Mon, 20 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:53:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190008 A Letters Patent Appeal was held not maintainable against a Single Judge's order passed in an appeal under Order 43, Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The text explains that Order 43 appeals are governed by Section 104 CPC, and Section 104(2) expressly bars any further appeal from an order made in such an appeal. The ratio in Shah Babulal Khimji was treated as inapplicable because it concerned an interlocutory order on the original side of the High Court, where a Letters Patent Appeal lay from a Single Judge to a Division Bench. The challenge therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 20 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190008