<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1949 (12) TMI 33 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190007</link>
    <description>Profits realised on sales effected in British India qualify as income arising in British India for residence determination; the court held the distinction between actual income arising in the territory and income deemed to arise under the statutory apportionment rule is material, so the apportionment mechanism applicable to deemed income does not apply to actual profits. Applying the charging provisions, profit arises on sale and is measured by sale proceeds less allowable costs (including cost of manufacture and transport); therefore manufacturing performed outside the territory does not automatically carve out part of sale profits for residence purposes, and the Commissioner&#039;s position is upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:09:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1949 (12) TMI 33 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190007</link>
      <description>Profits realised on sales effected in British India qualify as income arising in British India for residence determination; the court held the distinction between actual income arising in the territory and income deemed to arise under the statutory apportionment rule is material, so the apportionment mechanism applicable to deemed income does not apply to actual profits. Applying the charging provisions, profit arises on sale and is measured by sale proceeds less allowable costs (including cost of manufacture and transport); therefore manufacturing performed outside the territory does not automatically carve out part of sale profits for residence purposes, and the Commissioner&#039;s position is upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>