<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 542 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190006</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the Division Bench&#039;s decision that the Letters Patent Appeal was not maintainable against the order of the single Judge. The judgment clarified the limitations on appeals against interlocutory orders and the interpretation of Clause 10 of the Letters Patent regarding appeals to the Division Bench, emphasizing the statutory restrictions on the right of appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:23:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 542 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190006</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the Division Bench&#039;s decision that the Letters Patent Appeal was not maintainable against the order of the single Judge. The judgment clarified the limitations on appeals against interlocutory orders and the interpretation of Clause 10 of the Letters Patent regarding appeals to the Division Bench, emphasizing the statutory restrictions on the right of appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>