https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190006 A Letters Patent Appeal does not lie against a learned single Judge's appellate order on an interim injunction passed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 CPC, because the original interlocutory order is appealable under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) read with Section 104(1), and Section 104(2) bars any further appeal from an appellate order under Section 104. Clause 10 of the Letters Patent cannot be used to defeat that express statutory prohibition. The prior view treating such a further appeal as maintainable is stated to be incorrect. en-us Mon, 20 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:23:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190006 A Letters Patent Appeal does not lie against a learned single Judge's appellate order on an interim injunction passed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 CPC, because the original interlocutory order is appealable under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) read with Section 104(1), and Section 104(2) bars any further appeal from an appellate order under Section 104. Clause 10 of the Letters Patent cannot be used to defeat that express statutory prohibition. The prior view treating such a further appeal as maintainable is stated to be incorrect. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 20 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190006