<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1429 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190000</link>
    <description>The HC directed the withdrawal of the L.O.C. against the petitioners, involved in a criminal case, emphasizing that their fundamental rights under Article 21 remain intact. The court found no justifiable reason for the L.O.C., given their community ties and absence of serious allegations, deeming the order irrelevant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 10:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1429 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190000</link>
      <description>The HC directed the withdrawal of the L.O.C. against the petitioners, involved in a criminal case, emphasizing that their fundamental rights under Article 21 remain intact. The court found no justifiable reason for the L.O.C., given their community ties and absence of serious allegations, deeming the order irrelevant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>