https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189999 The court held that the petitioner, after voluntarily compounding the offence of stock suppression and non-maintenance of books of accounts under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, could not challenge the compounding order through a Revision Petition. The Deputy Commissioner and the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes were justified in rejecting the petitions, leading to the rejection of the Writ Petition with each party bearing their own costs. en-us Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Apr 2018 11:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189999 The court held that the petitioner, after voluntarily compounding the offence of stock suppression and non-maintenance of books of accounts under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, could not challenge the compounding order through a Revision Petition. The Deputy Commissioner and the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes were justified in rejecting the petitions, leading to the rejection of the Writ Petition with each party bearing their own costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189999