<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1373 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338293</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by reducing the addition for suppressed receipts from Rs. 11,00,000/- to Rs. 3,00,000/-, based on lack of substantial evidence supporting the higher estimation. However, the disallowance of foreign travel expenses for the assessee&#039;s wife amounting to Rs. 3,57,979/- was upheld due to insufficient proof linking the expenses to the assessee&#039;s professional activities. The order was issued on 03-01-2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 06:42:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1373 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338293</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by reducing the addition for suppressed receipts from Rs. 11,00,000/- to Rs. 3,00,000/-, based on lack of substantial evidence supporting the higher estimation. However, the disallowance of foreign travel expenses for the assessee&#039;s wife amounting to Rs. 3,57,979/- was upheld due to insufficient proof linking the expenses to the assessee&#039;s professional activities. The order was issued on 03-01-2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>