<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1366 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338286</link>
    <description>Where an identical substantial question of law in a wealth tax appeal had already been decided by the Court in an earlier matter involving the same assessee, the later appeal was treated as covered by that binding precedent. The Court applied the earlier view to the addition relating to the wealth of two trusts, answered the question against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee, and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 06:41:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1366 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338286</link>
      <description>Where an identical substantial question of law in a wealth tax appeal had already been decided by the Court in an earlier matter involving the same assessee, the later appeal was treated as covered by that binding precedent. The Court applied the earlier view to the addition relating to the wealth of two trusts, answered the question against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee, and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>