<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1364 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338284</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and confirming the appellant&#039;s entitlement to claim CENVAT credit for the service tax paid on the Goods Transport Agency service availed. The Tribunal criticized the lower authorities for not grasping the essence of the dispute and emphasized the importance of clarity in adjudication and appellate orders in matters of indirect taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1364 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338284</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and confirming the appellant&#039;s entitlement to claim CENVAT credit for the service tax paid on the Goods Transport Agency service availed. The Tribunal criticized the lower authorities for not grasping the essence of the dispute and emphasized the importance of clarity in adjudication and appellate orders in matters of indirect taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>