<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1359 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338279</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the original authority for a fresh decision after finding violations of natural justice principles. The appellant, a commission agent, had their rebate claim rejected without being given a proper opportunity to be heard. The lack of opportunity for the appellant to present their case before rejection was deemed unfair, leading to the decision for a fresh decision with proper hearing procedures in place.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1359 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338279</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the original authority for a fresh decision after finding violations of natural justice principles. The appellant, a commission agent, had their rebate claim rejected without being given a proper opportunity to be heard. The lack of opportunity for the appellant to present their case before rejection was deemed unfair, leading to the decision for a fresh decision with proper hearing procedures in place.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>