<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1358 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338278</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed all appeals by remanding them to the original authority, emphasizing the broad interpretation of &quot;input services&quot; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant was found entitled to input service tax credit, subject to invoice verification, despite services not being directly related to the manufacture of final products. The tribunal&#039;s decision was based on judicial precedents and the previous final order in a similar case, directing consistent actions for further adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 06:41:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1358 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338278</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed all appeals by remanding them to the original authority, emphasizing the broad interpretation of &quot;input services&quot; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant was found entitled to input service tax credit, subject to invoice verification, despite services not being directly related to the manufacture of final products. The tribunal&#039;s decision was based on judicial precedents and the previous final order in a similar case, directing consistent actions for further adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>