<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1355 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338275</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in both appeals, emphasizing that the clearance of goods as waste and scrap did not warrant duty liability. The judgments provided clarity on the classification of goods and duty liability associated with waste and scrap clearance, benefiting the appellant based on settled legal positions and interpretations of relevant case laws and notifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 06:40:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1355 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338275</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in both appeals, emphasizing that the clearance of goods as waste and scrap did not warrant duty liability. The judgments provided clarity on the classification of goods and duty liability associated with waste and scrap clearance, benefiting the appellant based on settled legal positions and interpretations of relevant case laws and notifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>