https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338269 Confiscation of imported shoes and cosmetics, together with redetermination of value and penalties for alleged IPR infringement and prohibited import, was held unsustainable because the adjudication did not comply with the Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007. The Tribunal noted that the goods had already been ordered to be released in appeal and found no basis to interfere with that appellate order. As the proceedings were illegal and void for non-compliance with the governing IPR enforcement framework, the confiscation and consequential penalties could not stand. The revenue's challenge failed and the relief granted to the importer remained undisturbed. en-us Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Nov 2017 11:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338269 Confiscation of imported shoes and cosmetics, together with redetermination of value and penalties for alleged IPR infringement and prohibited import, was held unsustainable because the adjudication did not comply with the Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007. The Tribunal noted that the goods had already been ordered to be released in appeal and found no basis to interfere with that appellate order. As the proceedings were illegal and void for non-compliance with the governing IPR enforcement framework, the confiscation and consequential penalties could not stand. The revenue's challenge failed and the relief granted to the importer remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338269