<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1348 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338268</link>
    <description>The case involved issues concerning eligibility for preferential duty rates under a Free Trade Agreement with Korea, classification of goods, authority to recall and reassess bills of entry, compliance with exemption notifications, and grant of stay applications by Revenue. The Tribunal directed reassessment of bill entries to grant preferential rates, verified certificates of origin for refund eligibility, and emphasized compliance with exemption notification requirements. The Tribunal allowed the appeal for a refund claim, dismissed Revenue&#039;s stay application, and stressed substantive compliance over minor procedural infractions for benefit extension.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 17:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1348 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338268</link>
      <description>The case involved issues concerning eligibility for preferential duty rates under a Free Trade Agreement with Korea, classification of goods, authority to recall and reassess bills of entry, compliance with exemption notifications, and grant of stay applications by Revenue. The Tribunal directed reassessment of bill entries to grant preferential rates, verified certificates of origin for refund eligibility, and emphasized compliance with exemption notification requirements. The Tribunal allowed the appeal for a refund claim, dismissed Revenue&#039;s stay application, and stressed substantive compliance over minor procedural infractions for benefit extension.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>