https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189993 Territorial jurisdiction for a writ petition cannot be determined by treating the place where summary court-martial proceedings were conducted as the sole ative factor. The jurisdictional enquiry must consider the full factual setting, including that the petition had been filed before the impugned order was made and the location of the Chief of Army Staff. On that basis, the High Court's dismissal at the admission stage for want of territorial jurisdiction was held unjustified, the order was set aside, and the writ petition was restored for decision on merits. en-us Fri, 19 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Jan 2017 17:32:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189993 Territorial jurisdiction for a writ petition cannot be determined by treating the place where summary court-martial proceedings were conducted as the sole ative factor. The jurisdictional enquiry must consider the full factual setting, including that the petition had been filed before the impugned order was made and the location of the Chief of Army Staff. On that basis, the High Court's dismissal at the admission stage for want of territorial jurisdiction was held unjustified, the order was set aside, and the writ petition was restored for decision on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189993