<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1446 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189986</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal as the appellants failed to prove payment of the sale consideration, leading to the conclusion that title did not pass to them. The vendor&#039;s cancellation of the sale was deemed justified, and the appellants were not entitled to the relief sought. The court recognized the practice of &quot;ta khubzul badlain&quot; in Bihar as pivotal in determining the passing of title based on full payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 13:00:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1446 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189986</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal as the appellants failed to prove payment of the sale consideration, leading to the conclusion that title did not pass to them. The vendor&#039;s cancellation of the sale was deemed justified, and the appellants were not entitled to the relief sought. The court recognized the practice of &quot;ta khubzul badlain&quot; in Bihar as pivotal in determining the passing of title based on full payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>