https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189986 Title did not pass merely on execution and registration of a sale deed where the parties intended completion only on payment of consideration and exchange of the registration receipt. The document and surrounding circumstances can control the apparent recital of payment, subject to the limits of Section 92 of the Evidence Act, 1872. On the stated facts, the purchasers failed to prove prior payment, the vendor retained possession and the registration receipt, and the vendor was therefore entitled to repudiate the transaction; the relief claimed by the purchasers was unsustainable. en-us Fri, 15 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Jan 2017 13:00:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189986 Title did not pass merely on execution and registration of a sale deed where the parties intended completion only on payment of consideration and exchange of the registration receipt. The document and surrounding circumstances can control the apparent recital of payment, subject to the limits of Section 92 of the Evidence Act, 1872. On the stated facts, the purchasers failed to prove prior payment, the vendor retained possession and the registration receipt, and the vendor was therefore entitled to repudiate the transaction; the relief claimed by the purchasers was unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189986