<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1334 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338254</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all four appeals. It upheld the disallowance of commission payments by the former assessee due to lack of evidence of marketing services rendered. The Tribunal also confirmed the latter assessee as a non-genuine firm, disallowing its salary, travelling, and advertisement expenses for lack of substantiating evidence. Past acceptance of claims in previous years does not validate similar claims in subsequent years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 06:41:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1334 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338254</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all four appeals. It upheld the disallowance of commission payments by the former assessee due to lack of evidence of marketing services rendered. The Tribunal also confirmed the latter assessee as a non-genuine firm, disallowing its salary, travelling, and advertisement expenses for lack of substantiating evidence. Past acceptance of claims in previous years does not validate similar claims in subsequent years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>