<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1320 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338240</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the department&#039;s appeal based on the Madras High Court judgment, emphasizing statutory compliance and registration timelines in determining cenvat credit eligibility for services and inputs availed before registration. The decision highlighted conflicting judicial interpretations and upheld the importance of adherence to statutory conditions for credit accrual.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 06:40:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1320 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338240</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the department&#039;s appeal based on the Madras High Court judgment, emphasizing statutory compliance and registration timelines in determining cenvat credit eligibility for services and inputs availed before registration. The decision highlighted conflicting judicial interpretations and upheld the importance of adherence to statutory conditions for credit accrual.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>