https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338230 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the issue of quantification of central excise duty demand and penalty to the original adjudicating authority for further consideration. The appellant was found eligible to exclude the value of chassis supplied by customers from the aggregate value of clearances for SSI benefit. Additionally, the appellant was entitled to cum-duty benefit even when excise duty was not collected from customers. The Tribunal affirmed the appellant's right to claim CENVAT credit on inputs after crossing the SSI exemption limit and paying central excise duty. en-us Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Feb 2017 15:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338230 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the issue of quantification of central excise duty demand and penalty to the original adjudicating authority for further consideration. The appellant was found eligible to exclude the value of chassis supplied by customers from the aggregate value of clearances for SSI benefit. Additionally, the appellant was entitled to cum-duty benefit even when excise duty was not collected from customers. The Tribunal affirmed the appellant's right to claim CENVAT credit on inputs after crossing the SSI exemption limit and paying central excise duty. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338230