<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1292 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338212</link>
    <description>HC held for the assessee, ruling that concealment of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars under s.271(1)(c) are distinct breaches and a penalty may only be imposed on the specific ground on which penalty proceedings were initiated and notified to the assessee. The court set aside the penalty imposed on a ground different from the one in the initiation notice, concluding against revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1292 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338212</link>
      <description>HC held for the assessee, ruling that concealment of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars under s.271(1)(c) are distinct breaches and a penalty may only be imposed on the specific ground on which penalty proceedings were initiated and notified to the assessee. The court set aside the penalty imposed on a ground different from the one in the initiation notice, concluding against revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>