<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1291 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338211</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and CIT(A), ruling in favor of the respondent. The income was classified as short-term capital gains, not business income, based on the assessee&#039;s intention to hold shares as investments, supported by factors like holding period and treatment in previous years. The Court found no substantial question for further consideration and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2017 09:31:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1291 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338211</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and CIT(A), ruling in favor of the respondent. The income was classified as short-term capital gains, not business income, based on the assessee&#039;s intention to hold shares as investments, supported by factors like holding period and treatment in previous years. The Court found no substantial question for further consideration and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>