https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338199 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that despite availing cenvat credit on inputs for manufacturing branded goods for others, the appellant was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 8/2003-CE for their own manufactured goods. The Tribunal emphasized the interpretation of the conditions for availing the exemption and cited relevant precedents to support their decision. Consequently, the impugned order demanding duty, interest, and penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief, clarifying the appellant's eligibility for the exemption under the notification. en-us Tue, 27 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338199 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that despite availing cenvat credit on inputs for manufacturing branded goods for others, the appellant was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 8/2003-CE for their own manufactured goods. The Tribunal emphasized the interpretation of the conditions for availing the exemption and cited relevant precedents to support their decision. Consequently, the impugned order demanding duty, interest, and penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief, clarifying the appellant's eligibility for the exemption under the notification. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 27 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338199