<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1265 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338185</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the trial court&#039;s judgment of acquittal, holding that the Appellant failed to prove the guilt of the Respondent beyond a reasonable doubt. The Appellant did not establish the due execution of the cheque, the legally enforceable liability, or his financial capability to lend the amount in question. Consequently, the Criminal Appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2017 07:06:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1265 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338185</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the trial court&#039;s judgment of acquittal, holding that the Appellant failed to prove the guilt of the Respondent beyond a reasonable doubt. The Appellant did not establish the due execution of the cheque, the legally enforceable liability, or his financial capability to lend the amount in question. Consequently, the Criminal Appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>