<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1265 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338185</link>
    <description>In a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the complainant must first establish the foundational facts of a legally enforceable debt before the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 can operate effectively. The High Court found no supporting account records or other material showing financial capacity to advance the alleged cash amount, and the complainant&#039;s own admission that he was not an income tax assessee weakened the claim further. The accused raised a probable defence on the materials, and the presumptions were treated as rebutted on a preponderance of probabilities. The acquittal was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2017 07:06:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1265 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338185</link>
      <description>In a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the complainant must first establish the foundational facts of a legally enforceable debt before the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 can operate effectively. The High Court found no supporting account records or other material showing financial capacity to advance the alleged cash amount, and the complainant&#039;s own admission that he was not an income tax assessee weakened the claim further. The accused raised a probable defence on the materials, and the presumptions were treated as rebutted on a preponderance of probabilities. The acquittal was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>