<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1024 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189968</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all grounds. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) appropriately considered the facts, documentary evidence, and legal principles in restricting the trading addition, accepting the books of accounts, addressing discrepancies in purchases, and disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) and salary expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2017 07:05:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1024 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189968</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all grounds. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) appropriately considered the facts, documentary evidence, and legal principles in restricting the trading addition, accepting the books of accounts, addressing discrepancies in purchases, and disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) and salary expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>