<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 1077 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189959</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the amounts adjusted from the revaluation reserve could not be reduced from the book profits under section 115J. The Tribunal emphasized that the amounts were neither credited to the profit and loss account nor qualified as reserves, thus not meeting the conditions stipulated in the Explanation to section 115J. The appeal of the assessee was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 17:58:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 1077 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189959</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the amounts adjusted from the revaluation reserve could not be reduced from the book profits under section 115J. The Tribunal emphasized that the amounts were neither credited to the profit and loss account nor qualified as reserves, thus not meeting the conditions stipulated in the Explanation to section 115J. The appeal of the assessee was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>