<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 1150 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189949</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Division Bench&#039;s order and restored the Trial Judge&#039;s decision in a case involving toll collection on the Durgapur Expressway. The Court discharged the Advocate-Receiver, authorized the NHAI to oversee toll collection, and emphasized statutory compliance and protecting public revenue. The judgment highlighted the need for competitive bidding and adherence to rules in toll contracts, ultimately allowing the appeals with no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 16:42:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 1150 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189949</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Division Bench&#039;s order and restored the Trial Judge&#039;s decision in a case involving toll collection on the Durgapur Expressway. The Court discharged the Advocate-Receiver, authorized the NHAI to oversee toll collection, and emphasized statutory compliance and protecting public revenue. The judgment highlighted the need for competitive bidding and adherence to rules in toll contracts, ultimately allowing the appeals with no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>