<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (12) TMI 189 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189947</link>
    <description>Timber used for crates was discussed as a possible consumable store required in the manufacture of machinery where packing formed an integral and commercially expedient part of bringing goods into saleable form. The Court reiterated that manufacture may extend beyond the immediate production process if crating is necessary to preserve the machinery&#039;s precision and deliver it without affecting customer specifications. On the material before it, however, the issue remained factual and could not be determined for want of sufficient evidence, so the reference was left unanswered and the matter left for adjustment under section 69(4) after any further evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 14:53:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (12) TMI 189 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189947</link>
      <description>Timber used for crates was discussed as a possible consumable store required in the manufacture of machinery where packing formed an integral and commercially expedient part of bringing goods into saleable form. The Court reiterated that manufacture may extend beyond the immediate production process if crating is necessary to preserve the machinery&#039;s precision and deliver it without affecting customer specifications. On the material before it, however, the issue remained factual and could not be determined for want of sufficient evidence, so the reference was left unanswered and the matter left for adjustment under section 69(4) after any further evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>