<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1256 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338176</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals where the satisfaction recorded by the Assessing Officer was found to be ambiguous and the notice issued under section 274 was invalid. In cases where the satisfaction was correctly recorded, the penalty was upheld. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of clear and specific satisfaction by the Assessing Officer and the need for the notice to unambiguously specify the charge against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2018 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1256 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338176</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals where the satisfaction recorded by the Assessing Officer was found to be ambiguous and the notice issued under section 274 was invalid. In cases where the satisfaction was correctly recorded, the penalty was upheld. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of clear and specific satisfaction by the Assessing Officer and the need for the notice to unambiguously specify the charge against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>