<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1251 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338171</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing that only the net profit rate of 6% be applied to the bogus purchases instead of adding the entire amount as income. The decision was based on the lack of thorough inquiry by the AO and the principle that only the profit element in bogus purchases should be subject to tax. The same reasoning was applied to a similar appeal, which was also partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1251 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338171</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing that only the net profit rate of 6% be applied to the bogus purchases instead of adding the entire amount as income. The decision was based on the lack of thorough inquiry by the AO and the principle that only the profit element in bogus purchases should be subject to tax. The same reasoning was applied to a similar appeal, which was also partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>