<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 203 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6570</link>
    <description>SC held that &quot;turnover&quot; for deduction under s.80HHC(3)(b) must be given its plain meaning and includes excise duty and sales tax when computing total turnover. Relying on the earlier SC view, the court rejected the appellant&#039;s contention that those taxes excluded from turnover and found no need for external aids of interpretation. The appeal was dismissed as without merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 203 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6570</link>
      <description>SC held that &quot;turnover&quot; for deduction under s.80HHC(3)(b) must be given its plain meaning and includes excise duty and sales tax when computing total turnover. Relying on the earlier SC view, the court rejected the appellant&#039;s contention that those taxes excluded from turnover and found no need for external aids of interpretation. The appeal was dismissed as without merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>