<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1239 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338159</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (A)&#039;s decision to drop penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, finding no illegality or infirmity in the order. The appeal by the Revenue against the dropping of penalties was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:58:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1239 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338159</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (A)&#039;s decision to drop penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, finding no illegality or infirmity in the order. The appeal by the Revenue against the dropping of penalties was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>