<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1236 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338156</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeals seeking refund of accumulated CENVAT credit for input services used in providing taxable output services. The Commissioner (A) had partially denied the refund, citing reasons related to service quality and efficiency. The Tribunal, relying on legal precedents and emphasizing the nexus requirement for refunds, concluded that all denied services qualified as input services. The impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant&#039;s appeals pending document verification. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the appellant&#039;s right to refund based on the interpretation of input services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1236 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338156</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeals seeking refund of accumulated CENVAT credit for input services used in providing taxable output services. The Commissioner (A) had partially denied the refund, citing reasons related to service quality and efficiency. The Tribunal, relying on legal precedents and emphasizing the nexus requirement for refunds, concluded that all denied services qualified as input services. The impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant&#039;s appeals pending document verification. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the appellant&#039;s right to refund based on the interpretation of input services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>