https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338153 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (A)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. The Tribunal found that the demand for central excise duty on scrap generated and cleared by job workers was unfounded, emphasizing that the liability and payment of excise duty were governed by specific rules. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the duty demand on scrap generated by job workers was not sustainable, in line with settled legal principles favoring the assessee. en-us Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:58:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338153 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (A)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. The Tribunal found that the demand for central excise duty on scrap generated and cleared by job workers was unfounded, emphasizing that the liability and payment of excise duty were governed by specific rules. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the duty demand on scrap generated by job workers was not sustainable, in line with settled legal principles favoring the assessee. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338153