<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1231 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338151</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal seeking to disallow cenvat credit on inputs procured from a dealer alleged to be non-existent, M/s S.K. Garg &amp;amp; Sons. Despite discrepancies and the retrospective cancellation of the dealer&#039;s registration, the Tribunal emphasized the absence of concrete evidence and investigations at the supplier&#039;s end. Relying on precedents and highlighting the need for tangible proof, the Tribunal upheld the order allowing the cenvat credit, stressing the importance of thorough investigations to support allegations of non-receipt of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1231 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338151</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal seeking to disallow cenvat credit on inputs procured from a dealer alleged to be non-existent, M/s S.K. Garg &amp;amp; Sons. Despite discrepancies and the retrospective cancellation of the dealer&#039;s registration, the Tribunal emphasized the absence of concrete evidence and investigations at the supplier&#039;s end. Relying on precedents and highlighting the need for tangible proof, the Tribunal upheld the order allowing the cenvat credit, stressing the importance of thorough investigations to support allegations of non-receipt of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>