<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1230 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338150</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals by determining the admissibility of cenvat credit on specific input services in accordance with the amended definition under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The decision also clarified the non-imposition of penalties due to the absence of mens rea.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2018 16:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1230 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338150</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals by determining the admissibility of cenvat credit on specific input services in accordance with the amended definition under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The decision also clarified the non-imposition of penalties due to the absence of mens rea.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>