<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1309 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189942</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting most additions made by the AO and partly upheld by the CIT(A), except for a token addition of Rs. 20 crores. The Tribunal also upheld decisions on sales tax subsidy treatment, additional depreciation on windmills, and disallowance of employee contributions to PF and ESI. The AO was directed to verify certain claims and allow the assessee to reconcile stock valuation differences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 17:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1309 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189942</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting most additions made by the AO and partly upheld by the CIT(A), except for a token addition of Rs. 20 crores. The Tribunal also upheld decisions on sales tax subsidy treatment, additional depreciation on windmills, and disallowance of employee contributions to PF and ESI. The AO was directed to verify certain claims and allow the assessee to reconcile stock valuation differences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>