<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1217 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338137</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata ruled in favor of the appellant in a tax dispute concerning disallowance under section 14A/Rule 8D for the assessment year 2009-2010. The dispute centered on the disallowance exceeding exempt income, the application of Rule 8D for disallowance calculation, and the use of borrowed funds for investments. The ITAT Kolkata agreed with the appellant&#039;s argument that disallowance under Rule 8D should not surpass exempt income, leading to the deletion of the addition made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:56:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1217 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338137</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata ruled in favor of the appellant in a tax dispute concerning disallowance under section 14A/Rule 8D for the assessment year 2009-2010. The dispute centered on the disallowance exceeding exempt income, the application of Rule 8D for disallowance calculation, and the use of borrowed funds for investments. The ITAT Kolkata agreed with the appellant&#039;s argument that disallowance under Rule 8D should not surpass exempt income, leading to the deletion of the addition made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>