https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189939 The Supreme Court set aside the IPAB's order due to a significant delay of six years in pronouncing the judgment, emphasizing the importance of timely justice. Guidelines were established to ensure prompt judgments, including monitoring pending cases and allowing parties to request early judgments for delays exceeding three months. The decision was solely based on the delay, not the case merits. The IPAB's order and the Deputy Registrar's order were both overturned, with directions to dispose of the opposition application within two months. Each party was responsible for their own costs in this matter. en-us Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:55:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189939 The Supreme Court set aside the IPAB's order due to a significant delay of six years in pronouncing the judgment, emphasizing the importance of timely justice. Guidelines were established to ensure prompt judgments, including monitoring pending cases and allowing parties to request early judgments for delays exceeding three months. The decision was solely based on the delay, not the case merits. The IPAB's order and the Deputy Registrar's order were both overturned, with directions to dispose of the opposition application within two months. Each party was responsible for their own costs in this matter. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189939