<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1207 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189921</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court addressed a contempt petition concerning interference with an investigation by the Enforcement Directorate in the 2G scam case. The petitioner sought reliefs including stay of proceedings in a writ petition and impleadment of individuals. The Court noted harassment of the investigating officer and interference attempts, leading to suo motu cognizance. Notices were issued, reply affidavits ordered, and certain proceedings stayed. The case was scheduled for further hearing. Additionally, progress reports in various cases were reviewed, and the Court directed these reports to be placed in separate sealed envelopes for record, scheduling further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:06:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1207 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189921</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court addressed a contempt petition concerning interference with an investigation by the Enforcement Directorate in the 2G scam case. The petitioner sought reliefs including stay of proceedings in a writ petition and impleadment of individuals. The Court noted harassment of the investigating officer and interference attempts, leading to suo motu cognizance. Notices were issued, reply affidavits ordered, and certain proceedings stayed. The case was scheduled for further hearing. Additionally, progress reports in various cases were reviewed, and the Court directed these reports to be placed in separate sealed envelopes for record, scheduling further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>