https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189917 A claim for customary bonus under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act is maintainable only if workmen prove a pre-existing legal right, either through a long, uniform and profit-independent practice or through an implied agreement forming a condition of service. The materials here showed bonus payments made after repeated demands and negotiations, with varying rates and no proof of payment in years of loss or irrespective of profits. The record therefore failed the established tests for customary bonus, and the correspondence also did not establish any implied contractual entitlement. On that basis, no enforceable right capable of computation was shown. en-us Tue, 30 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jan 2017 16:38:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189917 A claim for customary bonus under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act is maintainable only if workmen prove a pre-existing legal right, either through a long, uniform and profit-independent practice or through an implied agreement forming a condition of service. The materials here showed bonus payments made after repeated demands and negotiations, with varying rates and no proof of payment in years of loss or irrespective of profits. The record therefore failed the established tests for customary bonus, and the correspondence also did not establish any implied contractual entitlement. On that basis, no enforceable right capable of computation was shown. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189917