<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 722 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189913</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to accept the declared sale prices for both properties. The decision emphasized the importance of correctly declared consideration in determining capital gains and reiterated the revenue&#039;s burden to substantiate claims of undervaluation. The judgment highlighted the significance of judicial precedents in interpreting tax laws and ensuring fair assessments based on transparent transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 16:21:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 722 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189913</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to accept the declared sale prices for both properties. The decision emphasized the importance of correctly declared consideration in determining capital gains and reiterated the revenue&#039;s burden to substantiate claims of undervaluation. The judgment highlighted the significance of judicial precedents in interpreting tax laws and ensuring fair assessments based on transparent transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>